еще передает слова адвоката РФ, там все еще чудесней
So, what did Russia's top silk quote to back up his legal case? The Dutch-led JIT report that has been consistently dismissed by Russia as biased, politically motivated and full of fabricated evidence.
"There was no such evidence in the JIT video extracts that you were shown yesterday," he told the court.
"These show the alleged delivery of a weapon by Russia, nothing more."
To further hammer the Ukrainian case, he accused their legal team of not quoting enough evidence from the joint investigation team's report.
"Ukraine has elected not to put before you the contents of the alleged intercepts … which show quite clearly that whoever was allegedly supplying this Buk was acting in response to a series of armed strikes by Ukraine's military aircraft
," he said.
Samuel Wordsworth QC's logic may end up winning a critical case for Russia in the ICJ, but he may in the process expose some of the holes in the Kremlin's defence of who supplied the Buk missile that killed 298 innocent people.
Прекрасно, не? ну подумаешь, привезли установку. для чего надо, для того и привезли